first monday on a tuesday: a travel log
From: Eric Lease Morgan <emorgan@nd.edu> Date: May 18, 2006 3:52:42 PM EDT To: OSS4Lib OSS4Lib <oss4lib-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: first monday on a tuesday: a travel log First Monday on a Tuesday: A travel log This is a brief travel log documenting my experiences at the First Monday Conference "FM10 Openness: Code, science, and content" (May 15-17, 2006). In a sentence, the day I attended (Tuesday, May 16) the conference's papers described policy and theory regarding open content, open licenses, and open science: http://numenor.lib.uic.edu/fmconference/ Tim Hubbard The day was opened up by Tim Hubbard (Human Genome Analysis Group). He described how open science is/was being used to map the human genome. He advocated open data because open data makes for better science, and he said this kind of work is more possible now than in the past because of high speed network access. He also illustrated how competition can play a role in increasing productivity. +----------+ | hospital +----------+ +----------+ | ^ | | | +---+------+ +---> +-------------+ | hospital +----------------> | open source | +---+------+ +---> | code/data | | ^ | +------+------+ | | | | | +---+------+ | | | | hospital +------+ | | +----------+ | | ^ | | | | | | | | | \ / +---+---+--+-+ +-----------+ | treasury | <---------------+ doctors | +------------+ +-----------+ The group (hospital) that contributes the most and most valuable code/data wins. I liked this presentation because it demonstrated how the ideas of "open" can and has been applied to areas beyond computer programming. Andrea Glorioso Andrea Glorioso echoed much of what Hubbard had to say in "FLOSS methods in biotechnology: data, information and knowledge in context". For example success can be defined in terms of useful data and the volume of data contributed to science. At the same time he wondered whether or not open licenses will prevail in open science, especially in the area of biotechnology. Many pharmaceutical firms license exclusively techniques from smaller bio-tech firms. Open source licenses are not exclusive. Something different will have to happen in terms of licensing and open science. Charlotte Tschider Charlotte Tschider (Proficient Inc.) gave a talk entitled "Investigating the "Public" in the Public Library of Science: Gifting Economics in the Internet Community". She gave an overview of the Public Library of Science and an overview of gift economies. She thought science was a sort of gift economy. She then described a study she did comparing citations and hyperlinks in open access journals and where those links appeared in "public" places. Much to her chagrin, not as much of the content (about 20%) showed up in blogs, wiki's, etc. Felix Stalder Felix Stalder (University of Applied Sciences and Art in Zurich) in "Variants of Openness" postulated three types of open projects: 1. executable (like computer programs) 2. verifiable/falsify-able (like data) 3. experiential (like art) One of his questions was, "How do we maximize the noise to signal ratio in these open projects?", and of course he postulated a number of answers: 1. voluntary hierarchy provide authority 2. authority given from below 3. software is "self-describing" and thus gives value 4. credentials as a short-cut to value A challenge of things open is, ironically, bringing them to a close. When is Wikipedia "done"? Some possible solutions include: personalization and making content related to one's experience. He used Amazon.com and LastFM as examples. Finally, experiential projects are extraordinarily subjective and one person's noise is another person's signal. Open Science: Panel discussion Clifford Lynch (Coalition for Networked Information), Andrew Odlyzko (University of Minnesota), and Neil Smalheiser (University of Illinois at Chicago) facilitated a panel discussion on open science. Some interesting quotes from the panel included: * "Science is a means of getting accolades from your peers." * "Open Science show your dirty underwear." * "Open science does not necessarily help a scientist's career." * "Open science could be implemented with a top-down approach as well as a bottom-up advocacy." * "Impact is not necessarily a measure of success." * "Distributed annotation may be a way to facilitate open science, but is hard to sell because scientists are monopolists." Lunch The crowd at the conference was VERY international. It felt like a meeting of the United Nations. I ate lunch with people from Canada, Peru, South Africa, the United States, and China. Joseph Reagle Joseph Reagle (NYU) started the afternoon session with "Notions of Openness". He described a number of things open: * open source software projects * open source democracy (blogs) * open source intelligence (Wikipedia) * open innovation communities (public domain stuff) * open content (Wikipedia and Digital Movie Archive) Common threads in all of these things open are: participation, collaboration, and sharing. Successful projects: create a project, have a level of transparency, integrity, non-discrimination, and non-interference. Aaron Krowne and Raymond Puzio Aaron Krowne (Emory University) and Raymond Puzio described some problems with licenses in "The Fog of Copyleft". Licenses proliferate. Content is moving from one place to another. In the first place the content was licensed in one way, but as it get moved to another place does the old license apply? The original GNU Public License says that things distributed under it can not be re-distributed in anything more restrictive. Krowne and Puzio called this "license lock". With things like license lock and incompatibility of licenses projects turn into silos or small pyramids. If license lock or incompatibilities were removed, then the pyramids could grow and build upon one another. _ ___ two "license locked" _____ _ projects _______ ___ _________ _____ _ ___ _____ _______ _________ ___________ two projects with _____________ compatible licenses _______________ _________ ______ Solutions to these issues include: raising awareness, using "copyleft" as a warning signal, work for institutional change, support a judiciary to legislative shift, and advocate greater simplicity. In short, social change is necessary. Fay Durrant Fay Durrant (University of the West Indies) in her "Openness, Access to Government Information and Caribbean Governance" described how "open government" is affecting change in the Caribbean. She enumerated a number of factors influencing access to open government: content, format blending, affordability, usability, information policy, and property rights. "Openness is the first element of good governance." "Openness is transparent." Increasingly I learned that the governments of the Caribbean are making it easier for community groups to access information and affect change. Eric Lease Morgan In "Ethical and economic issues surrounding freely available images found on the Web" I shared how images from infomotions.com are being used and abused. The issues can be stated as two questions: 1. The accessibility of freely available content from infomotions.com is a drain on Infomotions, Inc.'s resources. How can Infomotions, Inc. lower its expenses and/or increase its revenue in order to eliminate or at least minimize this problem? 2. There are people who are using the content from infomotions.com in a dubious manner. Are the copyright expectations of Infomotions, Inc. clearly articulated, explicitly stated, and to what degree enforceable? Possible solutions included: removing the images, programatically limiting referrals, licensing referrals, advertising, participating in affiliate programs, selling merchandise, adding watermarks, and embedding rights statements. See a pre-edited version of the article, complete with egregious uses of images, statistics, and the ability to search the statistics, here: http://numenor.lib.uic.edu/fmconference/viewpaper.php?id=1 Summary I congratulate Ed Valuskus and Team First Monday for completing ten years of publication. They definitely have something to be proud of, and I was honored to play a small part. The participants were lively, engaging, forward thinking, and brought a wider range of perspectives to the event. I foresee the 10th anniversary issue making a bit of splash when it is complete. At the very least, this conference was a good barometer measuring the current state of all things open. -- Eric "Having Fun With ASCII Art" Morgan University of Notre Dame
Creator: Eric Lease Morgan <eric_morgan@infomotions.com>
Source: This travel log was first posted on the OSS4Lib mailing list.
Date created: 2006-05-18
Date updated: 2006-06-27
Subject(s): open source software; travel log; open access publishing; First Monday;
URL: http://infomotions.com/musings/first-monday-2006/