Comments on: How “great” is this article? ./../index.html Artist- and Librarian-At-Large Sat, 04 Jun 2016 18:04:58 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.1.8 By: Digital Humanities 2010: A Travelogue « Infomotions Mini-Musings ./../comment-page-1/index.html#comment-3911 Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:52:21 +0000 ./../../../../index.html?p=570#comment-3911 […] How “great” is this article? […]

]]> By: Eric Lease Morgan ./../comment-page-1/index.html#comment-3838 Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:48:39 +0000 ./../../../../index.html?p=570#comment-3838 Péter, yes, you are exactly correct, and in the one of the next iterations of my informal Great Books/Ideas Project I plan to implement exactly the sort of thing you suggest. Thank you.

—
ELM

]]> By: Király Péter ./../comment-page-1/index.html#comment-3836 Wed, 14 Jul 2010 08:03:53 +0000 ./../../../../index.html?p=570#comment-3836 Hi Eric,

very interesting post and demonstration. One suggestion: maybe you should use a synonym dictionary (and a formal taxanomy) to transform those words in the text which has synomys for the words in the __DATA__ section. Eg. algebra is a child concept of mathematics, but if the text won’t mention math, just algebra, the text won’t match the idea.

Regards,
Péter

]]>