<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Code4Lib Software Award: Loose ends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infomotions.com/blog/2009/04/code4lib-software-award-loose-ends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infomotions.com/blog/2009/04/code4lib-software-award-loose-ends/</link>
	<description>Thoughts in libraries and librarianship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:26:26 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brenda Chawner</title>
		<link>http://infomotions.com/blog/2009/04/code4lib-software-award-loose-ends/comment-page-1/#comment-1003</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda Chawner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infomotions.com/blog/?p=273#comment-1003</guid>
		<description>Eric, I agree with you that an award (or possibly a set of awards) is a good idea, and am disappointed at the lack of support your proposal received. As I said in a posting to the Code4Lib email discussion list, I like the model used for the New Zealand Open Source Awards, which recognise both projects and individual contributions. I find it hard to see why other members of the Code4Lib community don&#039;t want to celebrate success, which would indicate (to me at least) that the community/software was reaching a new stage of maturity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, I agree with you that an award (or possibly a set of awards) is a good idea, and am disappointed at the lack of support your proposal received. As I said in a posting to the Code4Lib email discussion list, I like the model used for the New Zealand Open Source Awards, which recognise both projects and individual contributions. I find it hard to see why other members of the Code4Lib community don&#8217;t want to celebrate success, which would indicate (to me at least) that the community/software was reaching a new stage of maturity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
