<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Visit to Ball State University	</title>
	<atom:link href="./index.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>./../index.html</link>
	<description>Artist- and Librarian-At-Large</description>
	<lastBuildDate>
	Sat, 04 Jun 2016 18:04:58 +0000	</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.1.8</generator>
			<item>
				<title>
				By: Kelley McGrath				</title>
				<link>./../comment-page-1/index.html#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelley McGrath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">./../../../../index.html?p=107#comment-767</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[To be honest, &quot;sort of kind of&quot; is about all we were hoping for. It&#039;s better than zero.

For some materials, there are probably alternative ways of doing this (say, getting a dataset from someone who already has work-based records and just matching them to manifestation records), but not probably for the more obscure stuff. We either try to get it out of the MARC records automatically or we do it manually or we stick with what we have now (which doesn&#039;t work so well).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, &#8220;sort of kind of&#8221; is about all we were hoping for. It&#8217;s better than zero.</p>
<p>For some materials, there are probably alternative ways of doing this (say, getting a dataset from someone who already has work-based records and just matching them to manifestation records), but not probably for the more obscure stuff. We either try to get it out of the MARC records automatically or we do it manually or we stick with what we have now (which doesn&#8217;t work so well).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
						<item>
				<title>
				By: Jonathan Rochkind				</title>
				<link>./../comment-page-1/index.html#comment-763</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Rochkind]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">./../../../../index.html?p=107#comment-763</guid>
					<description><![CDATA[The conclusion I come to reading that article is &quot;not so much.&quot; They sort of kind of got it to work--by taking an awful lot of free uncontrolled text in the MARC and applying heuristics to it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The conclusion I come to reading that article is &#8220;not so much.&#8221; They sort of kind of got it to work&#8211;by taking an awful lot of free uncontrolled text in the MARC and applying heuristics to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
						</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
